From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Soeren Sonnenburg Subject: Re: seagate disks on sil3114 - slow? Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2007 07:21:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1193462462.7122.7.camel@localhost> References: <1192683290.5720.38.camel@localhost> <4716EA25.7060205@garzik.org> <1192697546.5720.51.camel@localhost> <472151D3.6060403@gmail.com> <1193377777.5984.13.camel@localhost> <47218442.4000103@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from nn7.de ([85.214.94.156]:50596 "EHLO nn7.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbXJ0FV1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:21:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47218442.4000103@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:08 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Soeren Sonnenburg wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:32 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > [...] > > OK I knew that one... about 50-60M/s - sounds reasonable, but if I > > understand the m15w problem correctly it can only be triggered on > > writes... > > 3114 -> no m15w problem and m15w doesn't slow down transfers. It locks > up certain drives. What slows down transfers is workaround for m15w. Which means Bernd's sil3114 m15w patch does not fix anything but maybe just lowered pci-bus load. Well.... Soeren