linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, liml@rtr.ca,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, kngregertsen@norway.atmel.com,
	sonic.adi@gmail.com, rmk@arm.linux.org.uk,
	alessandro.zummo@towertech
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] libata: kill port_info->sht and ->irq_handler
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 17:43:20 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <12028058033406-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1202805801343-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com>

libata core layer doesn't care about sht or ->irq_handler.  Those are
only of interest to the LLD during initialization.  This is confusing
and has caused several drivers to have duplicate unused initializers
for these fields.

Currently only sata_nv uses these fields.  Make sata_nv use
->private_data, which is supposed to carry LLD-specific information,
instead and kill ->sht and ->irq_handler.  nv_pi_priv structure is
defined and struct literals are used to initialize private_data.
Notational overhead is negligible.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/ata/sata_nv.c  |   29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 include/linux/libata.h |    2 --
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
index 7b7ba0e..5637b08 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_nv.c
@@ -466,58 +466,61 @@ static struct ata_port_operations nv_swncq_ops = {
 	.port_start		= nv_swncq_port_start,
 };
 
+struct nv_pi_priv {
+	irq_handler_t			irq_handler;
+	struct scsi_host_template	*sht;
+};
+
+#define NV_PI_PRIV(_irq_handler, _sht) \
+	&(struct nv_pi_priv){ .irq_handler = _irq_handler, .sht = _sht }
+
 static const struct ata_port_info nv_port_info[] = {
 	/* generic */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_generic_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_generic_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_generic_interrupt, &nv_sht),
 	},
 	/* nforce2/3 */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_nf2_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_nf2_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_nf2_interrupt, &nv_sht),
 	},
 	/* ck804 */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_ck804_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_ck804_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_ck804_interrupt, &nv_sht),
 	},
 	/* ADMA */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_adma_sht,
 		.flags		= ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY |
 				  ATA_FLAG_MMIO | ATA_FLAG_NCQ,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_adma_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_adma_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_adma_interrupt, &nv_adma_sht),
 	},
 	/* SWNCQ */
 	{
-		.sht		= &nv_swncq_sht,
 		.flags	        = ATA_FLAG_SATA | ATA_FLAG_NO_LEGACY |
 				  ATA_FLAG_NCQ,
 		.pio_mask	= NV_PIO_MASK,
 		.mwdma_mask	= NV_MWDMA_MASK,
 		.udma_mask	= NV_UDMA_MASK,
 		.port_ops	= &nv_swncq_ops,
-		.irq_handler	= nv_swncq_interrupt,
+		.private_data	= NV_PI_PRIV(nv_swncq_interrupt, &nv_swncq_sht),
 	},
 };
 
@@ -2316,6 +2319,7 @@ static int nv_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 {
 	static int printed_version;
 	const struct ata_port_info *ppi[] = { NULL, NULL };
+	struct nv_pi_priv *ipriv;
 	struct ata_host *host;
 	struct nv_host_priv *hpriv;
 	int rc;
@@ -2352,6 +2356,7 @@ static int nv_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	}
 
 	ppi[0] = &nv_port_info[type];
+	ipriv = ppi[0]->private_data;
 	rc = ata_pci_prepare_sff_host(pdev, ppi, &host);
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
@@ -2390,8 +2395,8 @@ static int nv_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		nv_swncq_host_init(host);
 
 	pci_set_master(pdev);
-	return ata_host_activate(host, pdev->irq, ppi[0]->irq_handler,
-				 IRQF_SHARED, ppi[0]->sht);
+	return ata_host_activate(host, pdev->irq, ipriv->irq_handler,
+				 IRQF_SHARED, ipriv->sht);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index b503a41..4101dfe 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -755,14 +755,12 @@ struct ata_port_operations {
 };
 
 struct ata_port_info {
-	struct scsi_host_template	*sht;
 	unsigned long		flags;
 	unsigned long		link_flags;
 	unsigned long		pio_mask;
 	unsigned long		mwdma_mask;
 	unsigned long		udma_mask;
 	struct ata_port_operations *port_ops;
-	irq_handler_t		irq_handler;
 	void 			*private_data;
 };
 
-- 
1.5.2.4


  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-12  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-12  8:43 [PATCHSET libata-dev#upstream] clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations, take #2 Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 01/10] libata: PCI device should be powered up before being accessed Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 02/10] libata: reorganize ata_port_operations Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 03/10] libata: implement and use ata_noop_irq_clear() Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 04/10] libata: normalize port_info, port_operations and sht tables Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 05/10] libata: implement and use SHT initializers Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 06/10] libata: implement and use ops inheritance Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 07/10] libata: make ata_pci_init_one() not use ops->irq_handler and pi->sht Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 08/10] libata: stop overloading port_info->private_data Tejun Heo
2008-02-12  8:43 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-02-12  8:43 ` [PATCH 10/10] libata: make reset related methods proper port operations Tejun Heo
2008-02-12 13:25 ` How to verify sht-ops-conversion patch doesn't change anything Tejun Heo
2008-02-12 23:55 ` [PATCHSET libata-dev#upstream] clean up scsi_host_templates and ata_port_operations, take #2 Akira Iguchi
2008-02-13  0:03   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=12028058033406-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=kngregertsen@norway.atmel.com \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sonic.adi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).