From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: libata hotplug question Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:39:01 +1100 Message-ID: <1259645941.2076.225.camel@pasglop> References: <1259561052.2076.73.camel@pasglop> <1259624651.2076.158.camel@pasglop> <4B1459B5.40504@kernel.org> <1259635420.2076.180.camel@pasglop> <1259644647.2076.204.camel@pasglop> <4B14A809.8000304@kernel.org> <1259645409.2076.213.camel@pasglop> <4B14AAD0.4060806@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from gate.crashing.org ([63.228.1.57]:55291 "EHLO gate.crashing.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751117AbZLAFjf (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Dec 2009 00:39:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4B14AAD0.4060806@kernel.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:34 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > In effect, they would be the same but if the hotplug notification can > be made reliable, I think using DFLAG_DETACH would be better as > there's already other users doing that (user requested detach and ACPI > dock removal). Allright. I just need to find how to tell it at boot that it's detached to avoid time probing a non existing interface but that's no big deal. Cheers, Ben.