From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Subject: Re: Faulty seagate drives, are going to be blacklisted? Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:24:07 -0500 Message-ID: <125975.1232472247@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> References: <20090120002923.065f24ca@diego-desktop> <85346.1232422345@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <20090120163028.63efeb1a@diego-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from turing-police.cc.vt.edu ([128.173.14.107]:42280 "EHLO turing-police.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752958AbZATRYW (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:24:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:30:28 +0100." <20090120163028.63efeb1a@diego-desktop> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Diego Calleja Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org --==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:30:28 +0100, Diego Calleja said: > Yeah, that's why I asked. Now that I think about it, it should probably be > the HAL people who should add one of those desktop "bubbles" warning the > users about the possible failure (they already do it for faulty batteries) Probably a better approach, as long as we leave enough info visible in various /sys files for HAL to figure it out - but I'm pretty sure we already do that... --==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQFJdgi3cC3lWbTT17ARAk0SAJ9Rs9SkFKYDPlNzOzSuB4oQZecC+gCfbQ8J aRhyNEhtcJMvRK0WKD78ohg= =9kAj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1232472247_95765P--