linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, bphilips@suse.de,
	yinghai@kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	jeff@garzik.orglinux
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] irq: add comment about overall design of lost/spurious IRQ handling
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2010 17:31:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1276443098-20653-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276443098-20653-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>

Give a general overview of the facility at the top of file and add
copyright notice.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/irq/spurious.c |   74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/spurious.c b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
index 2d92113..329555f 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -2,8 +2,66 @@
  * linux/kernel/irq/spurious.c
  *
  * Copyright (C) 1992, 1998-2004 Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar
+ * Copyright (C) 2010            SUSE Linux Products GmbH
+ * Copyright (C) 2010            Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
  *
- * This file contains spurious interrupt handling.
+ * There are two ways interrupt handling can go wrong - too few or too
+ * many.  Due to misrouting or other issues, sometimes IRQs don't
+ * reach the driver while at other times an interrupt line gets stuck
+ * and a continuous spurious interrupts are generated.
+ *
+ * This file implements workaround for both cases.  Lost interrupts
+ * are handled by IRQ expecting and watching, and spurious interrupts
+ * by spurious polling.  All mechanisms need IRQF_SHARED to be set on
+ * the irqaction in question.
+ *
+ * Both lost interrupt workarounds require cooperation from drivers
+ * and can be chosen depending on how much information the driver can
+ * provide.
+ *
+ * - IRQ expecting
+ *
+ *   IRQ expecting is useful when the driver can tell when IRQs can be
+ *   expected; in other words, when IRQs are used to signal completion
+ *   of host initiated operations.  This is the surest way to work
+ *   around lost interrupts.
+ *
+ *   When the controller is expected to raise an IRQ, the driver
+ *   should call expect_irq() and, when the expected event happens or
+ *   times out, unexpect_irq().  IRQ subsystem polls the interrupt
+ *   inbetween.
+ *
+ *   As interrupts tend to keep working if it works at the beginning,
+ *   IRQ expecting implements "verified state".  After certain number
+ *   of successful IRQ deliveries, the irqaction becomes verified and
+ *   much longer polling interval is used.
+ *
+ * - IRQ watching
+ *
+ *   This can be used when the driver doesn't know when to exactly
+ *   expect and unexpect IRQs.  Once watch_irq() is called, the
+ *   irqaction is slowly polled for certain amount of time (1min).  If
+ *   IRQs are missed during that time, the irqaction is marked and
+ *   actively polled; otherwise, the watching is stopped.
+ *
+ *   In the most basic case, drivers can call this right after
+ *   registering an irqaction to verify IRQ delivery.  In many cases,
+ *   if IRQ works at the beginning, it keeps working, so just calling
+ *   watch_irq() once can provide decent protection against misrouted
+ *   IRQs.  It would also be a good idea to call watch_irq() when
+ *   timeouts are detected.
+ *
+ * - Spurious IRQ handling
+ *
+ *   All IRQs are continuously monitored and spurious IRQ handling
+ *   kicks in if there are too many spurious IRQs.  The IRQ is
+ *   disabled and the registered irqactions are polled.  The IRQ is
+ *   given another shot after certain number IRQs are handled or an
+ *   irqaction is added or removed.
+ *
+ * All of the above three mechanisms can be used together.  Spurious
+ * IRQ handling is enabled by default and drivers are free to expect
+ * and watch IRQs as they see fit.
  */
 
 #include <linux/jiffies.h>
@@ -17,6 +75,20 @@
 
 #include "internals.h"
 
+/*
+ * I spent quite some time thinking about each parameter but they
+ * still are just numbers pulled out of my ass.  If you think your ass
+ * is prettier than mine, please go ahead and suggest better ones.
+ *
+ * Most parameters are intentionally fixed constants and not
+ * adjustable through API.  The nature of IRQ delivery failures isn't
+ * usually dependent on specific drivers and the timing parameters are
+ * more about human perceivable latencies rather than any specific
+ * controller timing details, so figuring out constant values which
+ * can work for most cases shouldn't be too hard.  This allows tighter
+ * control over polling behaviors, eases future changes and makes the
+ * interface easy for drivers.
+ */
 enum {
 	/* irqfixup levels */
 	IRQFIXUP_SPURIOUS		= 0,		/* spurious storm detection */
-- 
1.6.4.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-06-13 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-06-13 15:31 [PATCHSET] irq: better lost/spurious irq handling Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 01/12] irq: cleanup irqfixup Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 02/12] irq: make spurious poll timer per desc Tejun Heo
2010-06-15  5:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2010-06-15 16:34     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 03/12] irq: use desc->poll_timer for irqpoll Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 04/12] irq: kill IRQF_IRQPOLL Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 05/12] irq: misc preparations for further changes Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 06/12] irq: implement irq_schedule_poll() Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 07/12] irq: improve spurious IRQ handling Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 08/12] irq: implement IRQ watching Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 09/12] irq: implement IRQ expecting Tejun Heo
2010-06-14  9:21   ` Jiri Slaby
2010-06-14  9:43     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-14  9:46       ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17  3:48   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-17  8:18     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 11:12       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-17 11:23         ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 11:43           ` Alan Cox
2010-06-17 15:54             ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-17 16:02               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-17 16:47                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-18  6:26                   ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-18  9:23                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-18  9:45                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-06-19  8:35     ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19  8:42       ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-19  9:00         ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19  9:03           ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-19 14:54           ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-19 19:49             ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-19 20:07               ` Arjan van de Ven
2010-06-13 15:31 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 11/12] libata: use " Tejun Heo
2010-06-13 15:31 ` [PATCH 12/12] usb: use IRQ watching Tejun Heo
2010-06-14 21:41   ` Greg KH
2010-06-14 21:52     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-14 22:11       ` Greg KH
2010-06-14 22:19       ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 10:30         ` Kay Sievers
2010-06-15 11:05           ` Jean Delvare
2010-06-15 13:30             ` Kay Sievers
2010-06-15 11:20           ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 13:36             ` Kay Sievers
2010-06-15 17:36               ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-15 17:47                 ` Greg KH
2010-06-15 17:52                   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-21 13:51   ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-21 20:27     ` Greg KH
2010-06-22  7:32       ` Tejun Heo
     [not found] ` <1276443098-20653-12-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
2010-06-21 13:52   ` [PATCH 11/12] libata: use IRQ expecting Tejun Heo
2010-06-25  0:22   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-25  7:44     ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-25  9:48       ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-25  9:51         ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-25 13:02           ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update Tejun Heo
2010-06-25 13:03             ` [PATCH 2/2 #upstream] libata: always use ata_qc_complete_multiple() for NCQ command completions Tejun Heo
2010-08-17 22:03               ` Jeff Garzik
2010-08-01 23:47             ` [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update Jeff Garzik
2010-08-02  7:18               ` Tejun Heo
2010-08-04  4:22                 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  3:45       ` [PATCH 11/12] libata: use IRQ expecting Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  3:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  8:31         ` Tejun Heo
2010-06-26  9:16           ` Jeff Garzik
2010-06-26  9:44             ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-02 14:41               ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-02 14:53                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-10 10:06                 ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-14  7:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2010-07-14  9:26                     ` Tejun Heo
2010-07-27 17:37                 ` Jeff Garzik
2010-07-02 14:59 ` [GIT PULL] irq: better lost/spurious irq handling Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1276443098-20653-11-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bphilips@suse.de \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.orglinux \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).