From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pedro Francisco Subject: Re: ahci rmmodable and shouldn't Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 11:28:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1284892106.2650.4.camel@sundae-v2> References: <201009162256.04765.pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com> <47010.148.87.67.141.1284674336.squirrel@www.xenotime.net> <4C933A8F.2080305@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:55939 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752132Ab0ISK2l (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Sep 2010 06:28:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C933A8F.2080305@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Tejun Heo Cc: Randy Dunlap , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Sex, 2010-09-17 at 11:53 +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > Just don't rmmod a module which is serving a live filesystem. Why > does it even matter? >=20 =2E.. Ok, let me argue another way. What if my mail was called: =C2=ABl= smod shows false values ("Used by: 0") for module 'ahci'=C2=BB, would you ag= ree it was an error and should therefore be fixed? --=20 Pedro