From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Artem Bityutskiy Subject: Re: [RFC 0/9] Change the copyright info. Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 11:48:43 +0200 Message-ID: <1290851323.2379.3.camel@koala> References: <1290838879-11038-1-git-send-email-justinmattock@gmail.com> <1290843702.2379.1.camel@koala> <4CF0B781.2080209@gmail.com> Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4CF0B781.2080209@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Justin P. Mattock" Cc: trivial@kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 23:47 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > On 11/26/2010 11:41 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 22:21 -0800, Justin P. Mattock wrote: > >> > > > >> Below you will find a set of patches, that update the copyright in= fo from > >> Sun Microsystems to Oracle. > > > > Shouldn't @oracle.com e-mail used for such patches? > > >=20 > yeah was looking at all the @oracle addresses, but thought to just fo= cus=20 > on this part, then later send out something for the addresses Err, I actually meant that you (the submitter) should use @oracle.com e-mail, because it looks a bit confusing why @gmail.com guy changes copyrights :-) --=20 Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy (=D0=91=D0=B8=D1=82=D1=8E=D1=86=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=90= =D1=80=D1=82=D1=91=D0=BC)