From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] ACPI: Reference devices in ACPI Power Resource
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:41:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1330004496.2469.3.camel@hp6530s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1202211059180.1366-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 11:06 -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Lin Ming wrote:
>
> > > Then maybe you can use pm_runtime_no_callbacks() for the ZPODD device.
> > > It's explained in Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt, and I use it for
> > > USB interfaces.
> >
> > If pm_runtime_no_callbacks() is used, runtime PM sysfs attributes
> > won't be created.
> > Then how to disable ZPODD feature in userspace?
> >
> > Currently, I use "control" file of scsi device to enable/disable
> > ZPODD, for example
> > echo auto > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/ata0/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/power/control
> > echo on > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/ata0/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/power/control
>
> You could get the same result by using the "control" file for the ATA
> port.
>
> > > The idea is that the ZPODD will never receive any runtime PM callbacks
> > > from the PM core. �Instead the ATA port callback routines will be
> > > responsible for power management of the ZPODD device.
> >
> > Does the ATA port callback also responsible to resume its child?
> >
> > For example,
> > /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.2/ata0/host1/target1:0:0/1:0:0:0/
> >
> > ata0 is resumed.
> >
> > Then who will be responsible to resume host1, target1:0:0 and 1:0:0:0?
> >
> > Or do you mean that we don't need to resume these devices at all?
> > host1 and target1:0:0 are logical devices, but I think 1:0:0:0 is not.
>
> That's right. It makes no difference whether the host and target
> are resumed or suspended. In fact, you could also call
> pm_runtime_no_callbacks() for them.
But host and target are added in scsi layer. How do we know if they are
"logical device"?
Or do you mean that we can call pm_runtime_no_callbacks() for them
because scsi layer(scsi_pm.c) only implements runtime pm for scsi
device.
Thanks,
Lin Ming
>
> Alan Stern
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-23 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 9:11 [RFC] ACPI D3Cold state and SATA ZPODD support Lin Ming
2012-02-13 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] ACPI: Introduce ACPI D3_COLD state support Lin Ming
2012-02-13 20:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-14 7:07 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-14 22:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-16 7:08 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-17 22:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-20 5:39 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-13 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] ACPI: Reference devices in ACPI Power Resource Lin Ming
2012-02-13 20:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-14 7:59 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-14 22:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-16 7:18 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-16 15:13 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-17 1:12 ` Lin Ming
2012-02-17 22:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-17 7:05 ` Zhang, Rui
2012-02-17 15:07 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-21 14:07 ` Lin Ming
2012-02-21 16:06 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-23 13:41 ` Lin Ming [this message]
2012-02-23 18:10 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-17 22:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-20 5:43 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-13 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] ACPI: Runtime resume all devices covered by a power resource Lin Ming
2012-02-13 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] PM / Runtime: Introduce flag can_power_off Lin Ming
2012-02-13 15:01 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-13 19:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 20:41 ` Alan Stern
2012-02-13 20:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-14 7:11 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-14 22:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-14 6:17 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-14 22:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-16 7:41 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-17 23:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-18 12:54 ` huang ying
2012-02-18 20:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-20 3:23 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-20 23:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-21 1:13 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-21 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-22 0:57 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-14 6:07 ` Zhang Rui
2012-02-13 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] PCI: Move acpi_dev_run_wake to acpi core Lin Ming
2012-02-13 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-02-13 9:11 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] libata: add ZPODD support Lin Ming
2012-02-15 6:06 ` Aaron Lu
2012-02-15 6:46 ` Lin Ming
2012-02-15 7:18 ` Aaron Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1330004496.2469.3.camel@hp6530s \
--to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).