From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Dons Tychsen <donpedro@tdcadsl.dk>
Subject: Re: Regressions in sata_nv regarding STANDYBY IMMEDIATE.
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:50:46 +0200
Message-ID: <1335811846.2161.0.camel@donpedro>
References: <1335337953.2409.17.camel@donpedro> <4F9B8E96.1010802@gmail.com>
Reply-To: donpedro@tdcadsl.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cicero-fbr1.cybercity.dk ([212.242.40.5]:50504 "EHLO
	cicero-fbr1.cybercity.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753636Ab2D3SwA (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:52:00 -0400
Received: from smtp2.cybercity.dk (smtp2.cybercity.dk [212.242.43.252])
	by cicero-fbr1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46073D2B6F
	for <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 20:51:58 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <4F9B8E96.1010802@gmail.com>
Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
To: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the comments,

On Sat, 2012-04-28 at 00:30 -0600, Robert Hancock wrote:
> What was the last kernel that was known to work OK? 

I will try to find the time to bisect it properly.

Thanks,

/pedro