From: MisterE <MisterE2002@zonnet.nl>
To: Alexander Sabourenkov <screwdriver@lxnt.info>
Cc: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>,
htejun@gmail.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
benh@kernel.crashing.org, jgarzik@pobox.com,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
jeff@garzik.orglinux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re[2]: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:39:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <135469746.20071017143929@zonnet.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47035355.2040405@lxnt.info>
Hello,
Wednesday, October 3, 2007, 10:31:17 AM, you wrote:
> Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm thinking of replacing both 3512 controllers with a Promise SATA300
>>> TX4. Do you know if there are problems with this device?
>>
>> (please don't top-post)
>>
>> There are no known data-corruption issues with Promise SATA cards.
>> However, some of them, especially the 2nd generation SATA300 TX4,
>> are known to trigger intermittent error interrupts (that are dealt
>> with but may cause a speed reduction) in some systems. We're still
>> scratching our heads on that issue.
>>
> But see this thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=119122463403033&w=2
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg14868.html
> Personally I would not recommend Promise SATA300 TX4 at the moment.
After all the problems i had with the sweex 3512 cards i returned them
to the shop and decided to buy a Sata300 TX4 (because the shop nearby
had one. Unfortunately the shops in the region don't have Highpoints)
Things looked promising when i inserted the card in both Intel D815EEA
motherboards. No problems detecting the hard drives (unlike with the 3512 cards).
With the 3512 i had LOTS of error messages and corrupt data when writing to it.
Using a separate videocard, instead of the onboard one, seemed to reduce the amount of errors.
But after some heavy reading/writing with the promise i got 2 errors. (see log file).
But i did'nt find any corrupt files. I can not reproduce the error.
I'm not sure if these are the "intermittent error interrupts" Mikael
Pettersson mentioned?
ps: as you can i see i got at the boot some errors from the boot disk
(hda). I not sure what is wrong with it. Sometimes it produce these
errors. Used a non-destructive read-write test with badblocks but no
bad sectors found. I don't know if this could influence the sata controller.
Alexander Sabourenkov can you please tell me where i can find the
"Bug is fixed in 2.6.23.1: sata_promise: port is slow to respond,
reset failed" thread you mentioned?
I also see that the driver is now at version 2.10. Is there something
really critical changed? I've tried testing with Debian stable
(2.6.18-4-686; sata_promise: 1.04) and with Debian Unstable
(2.6.22-2-686; sata_promise: 2.07). 2.6.23 is not in the repositories
yet.
So basically the question is this. Can i trust the SATA300 TX4 or
should i buy a Highpoint RocketRAID 1640/1740?. I can order such device
online but i need to be sure that it works correctly :(
--
Best regards,
MisterE mailto:MisterE2002@zonnet.nl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 12:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-03 7:26 Re[2]: Sata Sil3512 bug? Mikael Pettersson
2007-10-03 8:31 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-03 14:45 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-03 14:50 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-14 12:07 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-15 8:44 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-17 12:39 ` MisterE [this message]
2007-10-17 12:54 ` Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4 Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-17 15:04 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-17 19:21 ` Peter Favrholdt
2007-10-19 12:02 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-18 21:07 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-19 1:26 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-19 21:06 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-19 22:58 ` Re[2]: " MisterE
2007-10-19 23:58 ` Tejun Heo
2007-10-20 21:50 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 13:24 ` [PATCH-RFC] (was: Re: Sata Sil3512 bug?; Promise SATA300 TX4) Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 13:44 ` [PATCH-RFC] Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 14:08 ` Re[2]: [PATCH-RFC] MisterE
2007-10-27 15:09 ` [PATCH-RFC] Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 15:16 ` [PATCH-RFC] Promise TX4 implement hw-bug workaround Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2007-10-27 18:18 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-27 18:37 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 8:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-28 20:03 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 10:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-28 11:52 ` Alexander Sabourenkov
2007-10-28 11:10 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=135469746.20071017143929@zonnet.nl \
--to=mistere2002@zonnet.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.orglinux-ide \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
--cc=screwdriver@lxnt.info \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).