From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Bolle Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata-sff: remove dead code Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 12:00:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1399456806.6659.20.camel@x220> References: <1399204229.8729.15.camel@x220> <1399411616.2458.45.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> <1399454604.6659.13.camel@x220> <1399456196.2458.53.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from cpsmtpb-ews03.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.39.6]:54875 "EHLO cpsmtpb-ews03.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754598AbaEGKAJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 May 2014 06:00:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1399456196.2458.53.camel@acox1-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: David Howells , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 10:49 +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Unless you are editing the config with out of tree changes. Which is > possible which is why I said ask Dave. It's probably fine but best to be > safe. If you mean adding a "config NO_ATA_LEGACY" entry to some Kconfig file, and setting that symbol during "make *config", that will obviously work. But if you mean (hand) editing the .config, that wouldn't work, as the line for CONFIG_NO_ATA_LEGACY would be dropped during "make *config", wouldn't it? Paul Bolle