From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFT] ata: ahci_brcmstb: Fix misuse of IS_ENABLED
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:16:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438827394.19066.1.camel@ingics.com> (raw)
While IS_ENABLED() is perfectly fine for CONFIG_* symbols, it is not
for other symbols such as __BIG_ENDIAN that is provided directly by
the compiler.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
---
Hi,
I don't have a big endian machine to test this, so I'd appreciate if
someone can review and test this patch.
A similar misuse of IS_ENABLED is reported and fixed in:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/dma/mv_xor.c?id=0ec9ebc706fbd394bc233d87ac7aaad1c4f3ab54
drivers/ata/ahci_brcmstb.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcmstb.c b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcmstb.c
index 42b6cf4..fc6413f 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci_brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci_brcmstb.c
@@ -92,19 +92,21 @@ static inline u32 brcm_sata_readreg(void __iomem *addr)
* Other architectures (e.g., ARM) either do not support big endian, or
* else leave I/O in little endian mode.
*/
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS) && IS_ENABLED(__BIG_ENDIAN))
- return __raw_readl(addr);
- else
- return readl_relaxed(addr);
+#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS)
+ return __raw_readl(addr);
+#else
+ return readl_relaxed(addr);
+#endif
}
static inline void brcm_sata_writereg(u32 val, void __iomem *addr)
{
/* See brcm_sata_readreg() comments */
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS) && IS_ENABLED(__BIG_ENDIAN))
- __raw_writel(val, addr);
- else
- writel_relaxed(val, addr);
+#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MIPS)
+ __raw_writel(val, addr);
+#else
+ writel_relaxed(val, addr);
+#endif
}
static void brcm_sata_phy_enable(struct brcm_ahci_priv *priv, int port)
--
2.1.0
next reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-06 2:16 Axel Lin [this message]
2015-08-06 3:12 ` [PATCH RFT] ata: ahci_brcmstb: Fix misuse of IS_ENABLED Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1438827394.19066.1.camel@ingics.com \
--to=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregory.0xf0@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).