From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Race to power off harming SATA SSDs
Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 08:21:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1494228094.6528.14.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170507204007.GA25628@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1874 bytes --]
On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 22:40 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > NOTE: unclean SSD power-offs are dangerous and may brick the device in
> > > the worst case, or otherwise harm it (reduce longevity, damage flash
> > > blocks). It is also not impossible to get data corruption.
>
> > I get that the incrementing counters might not be pretty but I'm a bit
> > skeptical about this being an actual issue. Because if that were
> > true, the device would be bricking itself from any sort of power
> > losses be that an actual power loss, battery rundown or hard power off
> > after crash.
>
> And that's exactly what users see. If you do enough power fails on a
> SSD, you usually brick it, some die sooner than others. There was some
> test results published, some are here
> http://lkcl.net/reports/ssd_analysis.html, I believe I seen some
> others too.
>
> It is very hard for a NAND to work reliably in face of power
> failures. In fact, not even Linux MTD + UBIFS works well in that
> regards. See
> http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/ubi.html. (Unfortunately, its
> down now?!). If we can't get it right, do you believe SSD manufactures
> do?
>
> [Issue is, if you powerdown during erase, you get "weakly erased"
> page, which will contain expected 0xff's, but you'll get bitflips
> there quickly. Similar issue exists for writes. It is solveable in
> software, just hard and slow... and we don't do it.]
It's not that hard. We certainly do it in JFFS2. I was fairly sure that
it was also part of the design considerations for UBI — it really ought
to be right there too. I'm less sure about UBIFS but I would have
expected it to be OK.
SSDs however are often crap; power fail those at your peril. And of
course there's nothing you can do when they do fail, whereas we accept
patches for things which are implemented in Linux.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 4938 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 23:21 Race to power off harming SATA SSDs Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-10 23:34 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-04-10 23:50 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-10 23:49 ` sd: wait for slow devices on shutdown path Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-10 23:52 ` Race to power off harming SATA SSDs Tejun Heo
2017-04-10 23:57 ` James Bottomley
2017-04-11 2:02 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-11 1:26 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-11 10:37 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-04-11 14:31 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2017-04-12 7:47 ` Martin Steigerwald
2017-05-07 20:40 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 7:21 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2017-05-08 7:38 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-05-08 8:13 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 8:36 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-05-08 8:54 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 9:06 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2017-05-08 9:09 ` Hans de Goede
2017-05-08 10:13 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 11:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-08 15:40 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 21:36 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 16:43 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 17:43 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-08 18:56 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 19:04 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-08 18:29 ` Atlant Schmidt
2017-05-08 10:12 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 9:28 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 9:34 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 11:06 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-08 11:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-08 11:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-08 12:13 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-08 11:09 ` David Woodhouse
2017-05-08 12:32 ` Pavel Machek
2017-05-08 9:51 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1494228094.6528.14.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox