From: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, frankt@promise.com, andre@linux-ide.org,
sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v2] ide: pdc202xx_new: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in detect_pll_input_clock
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2018 16:41:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1523436087-4485-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com> (raw)
detect_pll_input_clock() is never called in atomic context.
detect_pll_input_clock() is only called by init_chipset_pdcnew(), which
is set as ".init_chipset" in struct ide_port_info.
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, detect_pll_input_clock()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
---
v2:
* Correct wrong usage of usleep_range() in v1.
Thank Sergei for pointing it out.
---
drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
index b33646b..6afa66d 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long detect_pll_input_clock(unsigned long dma_base)
outb(scr1 | 0x40, dma_base + 0x03);
/* Let the counter run for 10 ms. */
- mdelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10000, 11000);
end_count = read_counter(dma_base);
end_time = ktime_get();
--
1.9.1
reply other threads:[~2018-04-11 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1523436087-4485-1-git-send-email-baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--to=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
--cc=andre@linux-ide.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=frankt@promise.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).