From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Schlichter Subject: Re: Processes receive SIGSEGV if TCQ is enabled Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:11:55 +0100 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200310311411.59469.thomas.schlichter@web.de> References: <200310301601.55588.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> <200310301848.19065.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <20031031130041.GI7314@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_f+lo/EhkHgRJTAA"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp03.web.de ([217.72.192.158]:59153 "EHLO smtp.web.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263270AbTJaNMc (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:12:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20031031130041.GI7314@suse.de> List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe , Ivan Gyurdiev , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org --Boundary-02=_f+lo/EhkHgRJTAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 31 October 2003 14:00, Jens Axboe wrote: > It's probably via + tcq, that drive is known good with ide-tcq. At least > I've never seen problems with it. Maybe it is a problem with via + tcq... so, how to debug? @Ivan: Did you also use a via chipset when reporting the problems mentioned= in http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0307.2/1655.html ? Beacuse yo= ur=20 point 4) indeed looks very similar to my problems... Thomas --Boundary-02=_f+lo/EhkHgRJTAA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/ol+fYAiN+WRIZzQRAmpEAKCeL6JzglVhctR72P1e7Ks6HOdzvACghgpp zc+LwAf4BNfIM8kBV+29tpU= =Fm9L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_f+lo/EhkHgRJTAA--