linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 04:52:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040105035219.GA6393@leto.cs.pocnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200401032302.32914.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>

Hi Bartlomiej,

I've been playing with the code a bit.

I simple (but not really cleaner) solution to my original problem that
is minimal invasive is to use an unused field from struct request, in
this case nr_cbio_segments. It actually really counts the remaining
segments, only in rq->bio instead of rq->cbio. (The bio_kmap_irq
in ide_map_buffer prevents us from using anything else than rq->bio to
walk the request).

This segment count is then used to correctly restore the bi_idx fields
before ending requests instead of assuming they were zero.

(Well, I just also see that you could probably drop the scratch buffer
and just copy rq->cbio to rq->bio before ending the request... brrr,
no, that's just too ugly...)

BTW, what was ide_multwrite expected to return? These if clauses in
multwrite_intr are never executed.

Please don't shoot me for this proposal.


--- linux.orig/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c	2004-01-04 23:29:01.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c	2004-01-04 23:32:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
 			 * all bvecs in this one.
 			 */
 			if (++bio->bi_idx >= bio->bi_vcnt) {
-				bio->bi_idx = 0;
+				bio->bi_idx = bio->bi_vcnt - bio->nr_cbio_segments;
 				bio = bio->bi_next;
 			}
 
@@ -288,7 +288,8 @@
 				mcount = 0;
 			} else {
 				rq->bio = bio;
-				rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_iovec(bio)->bv_len >> 9;
+				rq->nr_cbio_segments = bio_segments(bio);
+				rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
 				rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
 			}
 		}
@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@
 	ide_hwgroup_t *hwgroup	= HWGROUP(drive);
 	ide_hwif_t *hwif	= HWIF(drive);
 	struct request *rq	= &hwgroup->wrq;
+	struct bio *bio		= rq->bio;
 	u8 stat;
 
 	stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
@@ -322,8 +324,10 @@
 			 *	of the request
 			 */
 			if (rq->nr_sectors) {
-				if (ide_multwrite(drive, drive->mult_count))
+				if (ide_multwrite(drive, drive->mult_count)) {
+					bio->bi_idx = bio->bi_vcnt - bio->nr_cbio_segments;
 					return ide_stopped;
+				}
 				ide_set_handler(drive, &multwrite_intr, WAIT_CMD, NULL);
 				return ide_started;
 			}
@@ -333,6 +337,7 @@
 			 *	we can end the original request.
 			 */
 			if (!rq->nr_sectors) {	/* all done? */
+				bio->bi_idx = bio->bi_vcnt - bio->nr_cbio_segments;
 				rq = hwgroup->rq;
 				ide_end_request(drive, 1, rq->nr_sectors);
 				return ide_stopped;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-01-05  3:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1072977507.4170.14.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net>
2004-01-01 11:27 ` Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-02  3:20   ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-02  4:43     ` CPRM ?? " Andre Hedrick
2004-01-02 11:30       ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-03  7:53         ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-03 10:57           ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-03 19:55             ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-04 10:42               ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-04 22:02                 ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-05 10:17                   ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-02 12:45       ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-03  7:51         ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-03 22:02     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-04 17:30       ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 16:12         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 16:48           ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05  3:52       ` Christophe Saout [this message]
2004-01-05 17:08         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 22:51           ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 23:59             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-06 11:33               ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-06 14:38                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-06 15:21                   ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05  4:03       ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 16:47         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 16:49           ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-05 17:13             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 18:16               ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-05 18:27                 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-01 23:02 ` Andre Hedrick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040105035219.GA6393@leto.cs.pocnet.net \
    --to=christophe@saout.de \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).