From: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 04:52:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040105035219.GA6393@leto.cs.pocnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200401032302.32914.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Hi Bartlomiej,
I've been playing with the code a bit.
I simple (but not really cleaner) solution to my original problem that
is minimal invasive is to use an unused field from struct request, in
this case nr_cbio_segments. It actually really counts the remaining
segments, only in rq->bio instead of rq->cbio. (The bio_kmap_irq
in ide_map_buffer prevents us from using anything else than rq->bio to
walk the request).
This segment count is then used to correctly restore the bi_idx fields
before ending requests instead of assuming they were zero.
(Well, I just also see that you could probably drop the scratch buffer
and just copy rq->cbio to rq->bio before ending the request... brrr,
no, that's just too ugly...)
BTW, what was ide_multwrite expected to return? These if clauses in
multwrite_intr are never executed.
Please don't shoot me for this proposal.
--- linux.orig/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2004-01-04 23:29:01.000000000 +0100
+++ linux/drivers/ide/ide-disk.c 2004-01-04 23:32:32.000000000 +0100
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@
* all bvecs in this one.
*/
if (++bio->bi_idx >= bio->bi_vcnt) {
- bio->bi_idx = 0;
+ bio->bi_idx = bio->bi_vcnt - bio->nr_cbio_segments;
bio = bio->bi_next;
}
@@ -288,7 +288,8 @@
mcount = 0;
} else {
rq->bio = bio;
- rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_iovec(bio)->bv_len >> 9;
+ rq->nr_cbio_segments = bio_segments(bio);
+ rq->current_nr_sectors = bio_cur_sectors(bio);
rq->hard_cur_sectors = rq->current_nr_sectors;
}
}
@@ -312,6 +313,7 @@
ide_hwgroup_t *hwgroup = HWGROUP(drive);
ide_hwif_t *hwif = HWIF(drive);
struct request *rq = &hwgroup->wrq;
+ struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
u8 stat;
stat = hwif->INB(IDE_STATUS_REG);
@@ -322,8 +324,10 @@
* of the request
*/
if (rq->nr_sectors) {
- if (ide_multwrite(drive, drive->mult_count))
+ if (ide_multwrite(drive, drive->mult_count)) {
+ bio->bi_idx = bio->bi_vcnt - bio->nr_cbio_segments;
return ide_stopped;
+ }
ide_set_handler(drive, &multwrite_intr, WAIT_CMD, NULL);
return ide_started;
}
@@ -333,6 +337,7 @@
* we can end the original request.
*/
if (!rq->nr_sectors) { /* all done? */
+ bio->bi_idx = bio->bi_vcnt - bio->nr_cbio_segments;
rq = hwgroup->rq;
ide_end_request(drive, 1, rq->nr_sectors);
return ide_stopped;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-05 3:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1072977507.4170.14.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net>
2004-01-01 11:27 ` Possibly wrong BIO usage in ide_multwrite Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-02 3:20 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-02 4:43 ` CPRM ?? " Andre Hedrick
2004-01-02 11:30 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-03 7:53 ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-03 10:57 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-03 19:55 ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-04 10:42 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-04 22:02 ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-05 10:17 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-02 12:45 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-03 7:51 ` Andre Hedrick
2004-01-03 22:02 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-04 17:30 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 16:12 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 16:48 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 3:52 ` Christophe Saout [this message]
2004-01-05 17:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 22:51 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 23:59 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-06 11:33 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-06 14:38 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-06 15:21 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 4:03 ` Christophe Saout
2004-01-05 16:47 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 16:49 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-05 17:13 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-05 18:16 ` Jens Axboe
2004-01-05 18:27 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-01-01 23:02 ` Andre Hedrick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040105035219.GA6393@leto.cs.pocnet.net \
--to=christophe@saout.de \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).