From: Thomas Themel <themel@iwoars.net>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: PDC202XX_OLD regression between 2.6 and 2.4
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:01:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040311190100.GV19928@iwoars.net> (raw)
Hi,
I'm currently trying to set up a system that contains a Promise 20267
controller, and it seems that DMA on that controller causes problems in
2.6.
My test case consists of simply creating an empty ext3 file system and
running bonnie++ on it. In 2.4.25, this works as expected. In 2.6.3-rc4,
however, it breaks after a few seconds:
Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:27:19 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:27:40 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:28:02 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: hdg: dma_timer_expiry: dma status == 0x60
Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: hdg: DMA timeout retry
Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: PDC202XX: Primary channel reset.
Mar 11 17:28:22 sophokles kernel: hdg: timeout waiting for DMA
Other information:
hdparm output is slightly different between 2.4 and 2.6 (hda is an
identical drive on a vt8233a controller on the motherboard) -
sophokles:~# diff -Nrua 2.4.25/ 2.6.4-rc3/
diff -Nrua 2.4.25/hda 2.6.4-rc3/hda
--- 2.4.25/hda 2004-03-11 19:48:29.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.4-rc3/hda 2004-03-11 19:52:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
- readahead = 8 (on)
- geometry = 14593/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
+ readahead = 256 (on)
+ geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
diff -Nrua 2.4.25/hdg 2.6.4-rc3/hdg
--- 2.4.25/hdg 2004-03-11 19:48:32.000000000 +0100
+++ 2.6.4-rc3/hdg 2004-03-11 19:52:31.000000000 +0100
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
- readahead = 8 (on)
- geometry = 14593/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
+ readahead = 256 (on)
+ geometry = 16383/255/63, sectors = 234441648, start = 0
I am a bit confused by the geometry changes, but they can hardly
cause the problem since hda works nicely under 2.6.
Can I do anything to narrow this down, is there a way to get more
debugging output?
PS: Is there an archive of this mailing list somewhere?
ciao,
--
[*Thomas Themel*] While differing widely in the various little bits we know,
[extended contact] in our infinite ignorance we are all equal.
[info provided in]
[*message header*] - Karl Popper
next reply other threads:[~2004-03-11 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-03-11 19:01 Thomas Themel [this message]
2004-03-12 10:26 ` PDC202XX_OLD regression between 2.6 and 2.4 fcp
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040311190100.GV19928@iwoars.net \
--to=themel@iwoars.net \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).