From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konstantin Sobolev Subject: Re: poor sata performance on 2.6 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:16:27 +0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200404151916.27605.kos@supportwizard.com> References: <200404150236.05894.kos@supportwizard.com> <200404151848.05857.kos@supportwizard.com> <1082041692.19571.82.camel@lotte.street-vision.com> Reply-To: kos@supportwizard.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.21.9]:45243 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264313AbUDOPNq (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:13:46 -0400 Received: from 81.211.110.66.adsl-spb.net.rol.ru ([81.211.110.66]:43904 "EHLO 81.211.110.66.adsl-spb.net.rol.ru" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by gnome03.net.rol.ru with ESMTP id S17475975AbUDOPNn (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 19:13:43 +0400 In-Reply-To: <1082041692.19571.82.camel@lotte.street-vision.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Justin Cormack Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 April 2004 19:08, Justin Cormack wrote: > Ah yes, I noticed that once or twice. Not sure what the reason is. It > may be something to do with how hdparm tries to deal with bypassing the > vm, or how the scsi layer deals with block size changes or something. I > wouldnt worry. It only happens if you do hdparm ever when the block size > is 512bytes. 68MB/s is pretty nice. Was thinking of getting some of > those drives. Thanks a lot! :) -- /KoS * Life with pets is never dull.