From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Konstantin Sobolev Subject: Re: poor sata performance on 2.6 Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:13:10 +0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200404160113.10553.kos@supportwizard.com> References: <200404150236.05894.kos@supportwizard.com> <20040415195053.GP468@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Reply-To: kos@supportwizard.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.rol.ru ([194.67.21.9]:25940 "EHLO smtp.rol.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263574AbUDOVK1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:10:27 -0400 Received: from 81.211.110.66.adsl-spb.net.rol.ru ([81.211.110.66]:41366 "EHLO 81.211.110.66.adsl-spb.net.rol.ru" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by gnome03.net.rol.ru with ESMTP id S17476630AbUDOVKY (ORCPT + 1 other); Fri, 16 Apr 2004 01:10:24 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20040415195053.GP468@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 April 2004 23:50, Pavel Machek wrote: > > /dev/hde: > > Timing buffer-cache reads: 1436 MB in 2.00 seconds = 717.03 MB/sec > > Timing buffered disk reads: 100 MB in 3.03 seconds = 32.95 MB/sec > > 33MB/sec "totally unacceptable"? Wow. well.. taking into account it's price and final 68MB/sec I've got after following Justin's advice.. :) -- /KoS * Jeez, if you love Honkus...