From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IDE update for 2.6.7-rc3 [11/12]
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 19:47:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040611174757.GA4436@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406111949.55984.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
On Fri, Jun 11 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 11 of June 2004 19:01, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 11 2004, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > [PATCH] ide: kill task_[un]map_rq()
> > >
> > > PIO handlers under CONFIG_IDE_TASKFILE_IO=n are never used for bio
> > > based requests (rq->bio is always NULL) so we can use rq->buffer
> > > directly instead of calling ide_[un]map_buffer().
> >
> > Not so sure if it's ever used for something requiring performance, and
> > even if it isn't then it may still be worth it to keep the mapping and
> > instead fix the task setup to map in user data with blk_rq_map_user() by
> > fixing up ide_taskfile_ioctl().
>
> I agree about blk_rq_map_user() (I even did it once around 2.5.60-70).
> However I think that we are better off (slowly) killing old taskfile
> handlers completely (this patch is for old taskfile handlers only)
> and using CONFIG_IDE_TASKFILE_IO versions (which know about rq->bio).
Ah these are the old handlers. Then I fully agree, nuk the mappings.
--
Jens Axboe
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-11 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-11 16:16 [PATCH] IDE update for 2.6.7-rc3 [11/12] Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-06-11 17:01 ` Jens Axboe
2004-06-11 17:49 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-06-11 17:47 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040611174757.GA4436@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).