From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Cox Subject: Re: PATCH: header updates for IDE changes Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 11:26:57 -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040816152657.GB10279@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040815145515.GA9993@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <200408161708.04376.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200408161708.04376.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Alan Cox , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 05:08:04PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > These changes belong to the patches making actual use of them... They just don't split along those lines and compile sanely. I did the entire thing as one operation because for a lot of it there are no middle grounds. > BTW What is the ordering in which your patches should be applied? Time order of message sending. I guess I should have added a PATCH n of m to it but didn't realise in time. While I've split them up for ease of understanding its likely a few steps along the way don't yield working IDE because of the interdependancies. Alan