linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: switch ide-proc to use the ide_key functionality
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 20:13:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040817001336.GA25753@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408170135.11465.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>

On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 01:35:11AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Alan, 'ide_key' protection misses driver specfiic /proc/entries.

Ok need to fix that

> It is also still racy for some drivers because ide_register_hw() -> 
> init_hwif_data() sets hwif->key to zero - you must set hwif->hold to 1.

ide_register_hw holds ide_setting_sem. I think that should be ok ?

> Can't we solve the problem in simpler way by covering affected /proc
> handlers with ide_setting_sem?

You'd need to refcount the ide objects because the 'data' value is long
lived. I did consider this but it seemed more complex. It also leaves end
users able to open an ide file and prevent unloading although I'm not
sure it is a big issue.


  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-17  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-15 15:04 PATCH: switch ide-proc to use the ide_key functionality Alan Cox
2004-08-16 15:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 15:30   ` Alan Cox
2004-08-16 23:22     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 23:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17  0:13   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-17  0:31     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17  0:41       ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17  1:05       ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 10:48         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 12:06           ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 22:15             ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040817001336.GA25753@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=alan@redhat.com \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).