From: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PATCH: switch ide-proc to use the ide_key functionality
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:05:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040817010533.GB32628@devserv.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408170231.25725.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl>
BTW this may help if I document the locks and what they cover in case its
not obvious
drives_lock is the spin lock you must own to update the drive list
ide_cfg_sem is the semaphore you must own to walk or hold loose references
to the ide_hwif_t array and elements relating to adding/removing/busy status
ide_lock is taken when you want to write that array and deal with elements
that are interrupt walked by other devices. Notably this means the hwgroup
chains.
ide_settings_sem could be per drive but isnt, it is used when you are
processing the ioctl/proc objects attached to the driver either by walking
them or removing them.
drivers_lock is the spin lock you must own to update the drivers list
drivers_sem is the semaphore you must own to walk the list and while
holding loose references to drivers (ie when the busy/lists are not
consistent)
The lock order is
ide_cfg_sem
drivers_sem
ide_settings_sem
drivers_lock | drives_lock
ide_lock
Which means my cunning plan from the previous mail doesn't actually work
unless we take ide_cfg_sem at the top of the proc code before setting_sem.
Also looking over it I need to send you the bits to take the sems in each
proc routine for that case.
PS: what do you think about deprecating (but not yet removing) ide_write_config
and ide_read_config now we have sysfs ? Does anyone actually use its
"wait for non busy and then pci config write" - does anyone use it at all ?
Also while looking at proc it would clean up read_imodel and make it a ton
more useful to stick the string pointers into hwif->chipset_name or somesuch
so we can report the PCI ones in detail ?
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-17 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-15 15:04 PATCH: switch ide-proc to use the ide_key functionality Alan Cox
2004-08-16 15:24 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 15:30 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-16 23:22 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-16 23:35 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 0:13 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 0:31 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 0:41 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 1:05 ` Alan Cox [this message]
2004-08-17 10:48 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2004-08-17 12:06 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-17 22:15 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040817010533.GB32628@devserv.devel.redhat.com \
--to=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).