From: Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Rogier Wolff <R.E.Wolff@harddisk-recovery.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Driver retries disk errors.
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:00:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040831170016.GF17261@harddisk-recovery.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1093965233.599.8.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:13:54PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2004-08-31 at 16:56, Erik Mouw wrote:
> > The SCSI disk driver has been doing a single retry for quite some time
> > and it hasn't really bitten people. Why would the IDE disk driver be
> > different? The only case I can imagine a retry would be OK, is when we
> > get an UDMA CRC error (caused by bad cables).
>
> Retries also pop up in other less obvious cases and conveniently paper
> over a wide variety of timeouts, power management quirks and drives just
> having a random fit. Eight is probably excessive in all cases.
There are indeed all sorts of other retries in various layers, the
worst one when the kernel tries to read-ahead a couple of blocks on an
IDE disk(1). You can work around them with raw IO or O_DIRECT.
> For non hard disk cases many devices do want and need retry.
And many others do not. CompactFlash readers are usually implemented as
a USB storage device, which on its turn is implemented as a SCSI
"disk". So far I haven't seen a CompactFlash which could be "fixed" by
retries.
iSCSI appliances can also make things worse: when the target machine is
implemented as a simple "pass everything to the real SCSI disk" device,
it's not really different from a directly connected SCSI disk. However,
when the iSCSI target interprets the SCSI commands and has its own way
to deal with bad blocks (i.e.: it retries the blocks), things can get
very bad when the kernel also uses a couple of retries.
In my experience it would be good if the IDE disk driver would behave
like the SCSI disk driver: no retries on a bad block. I agree that it
would be a good idea to make it configurable through the block layer to
avoid code duplication (blockdev --getretries/--setretries).
Erik
(1) Imagine an application doing a linear read on a file with an 8
block read ahead and the last block being bad. The kernel will try to
read that bad block 16 times, but because the IDE driver also has 8
retries, the kernel will try to read that bad block *64* times. It
usually takes an IDE drive about 2 seconds to figure out a block is
bad, so the application gets stuck for 2 minutes in that single bad
block.
--
+-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 --
| Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-31 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-30 16:39 Driver retries disk errors Rogier Wolff
2004-08-30 17:46 ` Theodore Ts'o
2004-08-30 18:26 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2004-08-30 22:25 ` Rogier Wolff
2004-08-31 11:38 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-02 16:23 ` Eric Mudama
2004-08-30 22:17 ` Rogier Wolff
2004-08-31 11:45 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-31 13:45 ` Andre Hedrick
2004-08-31 13:54 ` Rogier Wolff
2004-08-31 14:12 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-31 15:56 ` Erik Mouw
2004-08-31 15:13 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-31 17:00 ` Erik Mouw [this message]
2004-08-31 16:12 ` Alan Cox
2004-08-31 22:55 ` Christer Weinigel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040831170016.GF17261@harddisk-recovery.com \
--to=erik@harddisk-recovery.com \
--cc=R.E.Wolff@harddisk-recovery.nl \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).