From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: T10/04-262 ATA pass thru - patch. Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:49:54 -0400 Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040929124954.C26650@tuxdriver.com> References: <20040928001633.A8363@florence.linkmargin.com> <20040928003911.B8363@florence.linkmargin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([24.172.12.4]:43529 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S268762AbUI2SDR (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:03:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040928003911.B8363@florence.linkmargin.com>; from andyw@pobox.com on Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:39:11AM -0500 List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Warner Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , Pat LaVarre , Mark Lord On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:39:11AM -0500, Andy Warner wrote: > 2. Curtis has said that a new rev of the proposal is > in process. Specifically, the *.En bits are being > removed to make room for something else. Andy, It looks like you are expecting everything below the *.En bit to be shifted up by 1 byte. Am I reading that right? I guess I would have expected that space to become reserved for something else? Just comfirming... John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com