From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wichert Akkerman Subject: Re: 2.6.11rc4: irq 5, nobody cared Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:48:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20050221214829.GI6722@wiggy.net> References: <20050220155600.GD5049@vanheusden.com> <4218C692.9040106@tiscali.de> <20050220180550.GA18606@ime.usp.br> <200502211943.59887.bzolnier@elka.pw.edu.pl> <421A2D8F.3050704@pobox.com> <20050221194227.GH6722@wiggy.net> <421A4574.1000604@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from levante.wiggy.net ([195.85.225.139]:34770 "EHLO mx1.wiggy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262136AbVBUVsb (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:48:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <421A4574.1000604@pobox.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Matthias-Christian Ott , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rog=E9rio?= Brito , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Previously Jeff Garzik wrote: > These are _duplicate_ messages. The To/CC doesn't vary in my > experience. Therefore, sorting on To/CC always guarantees my messages > go into the correct folder. It depends highly on how you filter. It do not use To/Cc headers to choose the mailbox to deliver a message in since that will not work with things like bounces and aliases. Using headers like List-Id or X-Mailing-List is reliable, but does not work with the duplicate filtering you suggested. It is a matter of choosing your own preference. And ours seem to differ. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.