linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: kus Kusche Klaus <kus@keba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl,
	Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: 2.6.11, IDE: Strange scheduling behaviour: high-pri RT process not scheduled?
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:35:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050331113526.GB27731@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AAD6DA242BC63C488511C611BD51F3673231C2@MAILIT.keba.co.at>


* kus Kusche Klaus <kus@keba.com> wrote:

> I've written a small test program which enables periodic RTC 
> interrupts at 8192 Hz and then goes into a loop reading /dev/rtc and 
> collecting timing statistics (using the rdtscl macro).

getting /dev/rtc handling right for latency measurement is ... tricky.  
The method i'm using under PREEMPT_RT is:

 chrt -f 84 -p `pidof 'IRQ 0'`
 chrt -f 95 -p `pidof 'IRQ 8'`
 ./rtc_wakeup -f 1024 -t 100000

you can get rtc_wakeup from:

 http://www.affenbande.org/~tapas/wiki/index.php?rtc_wakeup

written by Florian Schmidt.

do you see high latencies even with rtc_wakeup?

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-31 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-30 11:52 2.6.11, IDE: Strange scheduling behaviour: high-pri RT process not scheduled? kus Kusche Klaus
2005-03-30 12:06 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2005-03-30 14:41 ` Mark Hahn
2005-03-30 20:37   ` Lee Revell
2005-03-31 11:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-30 12:21 kus Kusche Klaus
2005-03-31 11:05 kus Kusche Klaus
2005-03-31 15:19 kus Kusche Klaus
2005-03-31 15:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-04-01  9:07 kus Kusche Klaus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050331113526.GB27731@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=kus@keba.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mista.tapas@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).