linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Playing with SATA NCQ
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 10:00:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050527080014.GS1435@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4296D16F.9030805@pobox.com>

On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
> >On Fri, May 27 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >>Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>
> >>>I double checked this. If you agree to move the setting of QCFLAG_ACTIVE
> >>>_after_ successful ap->ops->qc_issue(qc) and clear it _after_
> >>>__ata_qc_complete(qc) then I can just use that bit and kill
> >>>ATA_QCFLAG_ACCOUNT.
> >>>
> >>>What do you think?
> >>
> >>Fine with me.
> >>
> >>Keep in mind that the attached patch was applied recently...
> >
> >
> >Yeah, the two hunks from the ncq patch would look like this then. Ok?
> 
> ACK (modulo my distaste for 'depth' and 'ncq_depth', of course... :))

Ok, lets get that fixed then... Would you like just a single
ap->queue_depth and a ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_IN_FLIGHT type flag instead?

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-27  7:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-26 14:00 Playing with SATA NCQ Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 16:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 17:07   ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 17:11     ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 17:15       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 17:33         ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-26 19:49     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 20:30       ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27  7:20   ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27  7:29     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27  7:33       ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27  7:51         ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27  8:00           ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2005-05-27  8:23             ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-26 21:50 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-27  6:28   ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27  6:58     ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27  7:15       ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27  4:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27  6:39   ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 21:40 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-27 22:16   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 22:30     ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-28 12:12       ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 13:01         ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 14:09           ` Mark Lord
2005-05-29 14:24             ` Tyler
2005-05-29 15:22               ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-29 19:04             ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 19:05               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 19:21                 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 19:03           ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 20:12             ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 20:17               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30  6:05                 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30  6:07               ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 18:10         ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 19:06           ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 16:03 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 16:34   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 16:50     ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 16:59       ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 17:23         ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 17:29           ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 17:45             ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 18:01               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 18:10                 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-29 18:14                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 18:27                 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 18:31                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-29 16:57   ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-29 17:26     ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30  0:06       ` Mark Lord
2005-05-30  7:29         ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 18:09           ` Mark Lord
2005-05-30 18:22             ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 18:25               ` Mark Lord
2005-05-30 18:34                 ` Michael Thonke
2005-05-30 18:51                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 18:48                 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 18:50               ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-30 20:03                 ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 20:19                   ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-31  7:44                     ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-30 23:14                 ` Mark Lord
2005-05-31  7:48                   ` Erik Slagter
2005-05-31  8:05                     ` Patrick McFarland
2005-05-29 21:49 ` Michael Thonke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050527080014.GS1435@suse.de \
    --to=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).