* Promise SATA300 TX4
@ 2005-07-14 2:35 Benjamin Hagemann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Hagemann @ 2005-07-14 2:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: linux-ide
Hello.
Will the TX4 driver in kernel 2.6.12.2 also support the new Primise
ATA/300 controller: Promise SATA300 TX4 ?
Thank you.
bye,
Benjamin Hagemann
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Promise SATA300 TX4
@ 2008-06-10 21:11 MisterE
2008-06-11 8:03 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: MisterE @ 2008-06-10 21:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Pettersson, Alexander Sabourenkov, Jeff Garzik, linux-ide
Hello,
A long while ago we had contact about corruption with this
controller. Then you people found the ASIC PRD bug.
When the 2.6.24 kernel was released i made a custom version for my
debian fileserver. It's now running for a while without real problems.
But now and then i get a message in my log which concerns me. I can't
reproduce them but mass actions (copy, move, delete, etc.) does not
seem to cause it.
Example:
Mar 24 14:27:59 fileserver -- MARK --
Mar 24 14:47:59 fileserver -- MARK --
Mar 24 15:07:59 fileserver -- MARK --
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: res 50/00:00:3e:3f:db/00:00:2a:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1: soft resetting link
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1: EH complete
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Mar 24 15:47:59 fileserver -- MARK --
Mar 24 16:07:59 fileserver -- MARK --
Mar 24 16:28:00 fileserver -- MARK --
May 25 17:00:19 fileserver -- MARK --
May 25 17:20:19 fileserver -- MARK --
May 25 17:23:33 fileserver kernel: res 50/00:00:3e:73:ea/00:00:21:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: ata1: soft resetting link
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: ata1: EH complete
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
May 25 17:23:34 fileserver kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
May 25 17:40:19 fileserver -- MARK --
May 25 18:00:19 fileserver -- MARK --
May 25 18:20:19 fileserver -- MARK --
May 25 18:40:19 fileserver -- MARK --
Jun 8 21:15:46 fileserver -- MARK --
Jun 8 21:35:46 fileserver -- MARK --
Jun 8 21:55:05 fileserver kernel: res 50/00:00:be:26:ae/00:00:19:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: ata2: soft resetting link
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: ata2: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: ata2: EH complete
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 976773168 512-byte hardware sectors (500108 MB)
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
Jun 8 21:55:06 fileserver kernel: sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
Maybe you can explain it?
Thanks in advance.
--
Best regards,
MisterE mailto:MisterE2002@zonnet.nl
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Promise SATA300 TX4
2008-06-10 21:11 MisterE
@ 2008-06-11 8:03 ` Mikael Pettersson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Pettersson @ 2008-06-11 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: MisterE; +Cc: Mikael Pettersson, Alexander Sabourenkov, Jeff Garzik, linux-ide
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 23:11:40 +0200, MisterE wrote:
>Hello,
>
>A long while ago we had contact about corruption with this
>controller. Then you people found the ASIC PRD bug.
>
>When the 2.6.24 kernel was released i made a custom version for my
>debian fileserver. It's now running for a while without real problems.
>
>But now and then i get a message in my log which concerns me. I can't
>reproduce them but mass actions (copy, move, delete, etc.) does not
>seem to cause it.
>
>Example:
>
>
>Mar 24 14:27:59 fileserver -- MARK --
>Mar 24 14:47:59 fileserver -- MARK --
>Mar 24 15:07:59 fileserver -- MARK --
>Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: res 50/00:00:3e:3f:db/00:00:2=
>a:00:00/e0 Emask 0x2 (HSM violation)
>Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1: soft resetting link
>Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 1=
>23 SControl 300)
>Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
>Mar 24 15:22:59 fileserver kernel: ata1: EH complete
Occasional hickups like these can be caused by inadequate
power-supply units. Nothing driver-related comes to mind.
/Mikael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-06-11 8:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-14 2:35 Promise SATA300 TX4 Benjamin Hagemann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-10 21:11 MisterE
2008-06-11 8:03 ` Mikael Pettersson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).