linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ATA Passthru "status return descriptor" additional length field
@ 2005-07-27 17:13 Timothy Thelin
  2005-07-27 17:26 ` John W. Linville
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Timothy Thelin @ 2005-07-27 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-ide

Hi,

The libata code sets that field to 14 (the size of the whole status return
descriptor), but the SAT spec (May 17) shows that field set to 12.  Which is
correct?

Regards,
Tim Thelin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: ATA Passthru "status return descriptor" additional length field
  2005-07-27 17:13 ATA Passthru "status return descriptor" additional length field Timothy Thelin
@ 2005-07-27 17:26 ` John W. Linville
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2005-07-27 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Timothy Thelin; +Cc: linux-ide

On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:13:13AM -0700, Timothy Thelin wrote:

> The libata code sets that field to 14 (the size of the whole status return
> descriptor), but the SAT spec (May 17) shows that field set to 12.  Which is
> correct?

I'm sure the spec is correct...gotta patch? :-)

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: ATA Passthru "status return descriptor" additional length field
@ 2005-07-27 20:04 Timothy Thelin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Timothy Thelin @ 2005-07-27 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: John W. Linville; +Cc: linux-ide

I have one, but I'm still working with my employer to make sure I'm allowed
to submit it.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: John W. Linville [mailto:linville@tuxdriver.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 10:26 AM
To: Timothy Thelin
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATA Passthru "status return descriptor" additional length
field


On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 10:13:13AM -0700, Timothy Thelin wrote:

> The libata code sets that field to 14 (the size of the whole status return
> descriptor), but the SAT spec (May 17) shows that field set to 12.  Which
is
> correct?

I'm sure the spec is correct...gotta patch? :-)

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-07-27 20:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-07-27 17:13 ATA Passthru "status return descriptor" additional length field Timothy Thelin
2005-07-27 17:26 ` John W. Linville
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-27 20:04 Timothy Thelin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).