From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ravikiran G Thirumalai Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] ide: Break ide_lock to per-hwgroup lock Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 08:42:01 -0700 Message-ID: <20050927154201.GD3822@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050906233322.GA3642@localhost.localdomain> <20050907091923.GE4785@suse.de> <20050907192747.GC3769@localhost.localdomain> <20050907193422.GS4785@suse.de> <58cb370e050927063674bb47a7@mail.gmail.com> <20050927152026.GC3822@localhost.localdomain> <20050927152641.GF2811@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from serv01.siteground.net ([70.85.91.68]:16273 "EHLO serv01.siteground.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964977AbVI0PmH (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:42:07 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050927152641.GF2811@suse.de> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jens Axboe Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Shai Fultheim (Shai@scalex86.org)" , Alok Kataria On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 05:26:42PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Sep 27 2005, Ravikiran G Thirumalai wrote: > > You should run it eg 10 times on each kernel to get a feel for the > variance of the results. Were you testing 2 or 4 disks? > Yes, I was planning to do that, We were testing with 2 disks. >... > I take it the numbers posted were for DMA enabled on all disks? Yes. Thanks, Kiran