From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCH] via82cxxx IDE: Remove /proc/via entry Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 23:37:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20050928223718.GB7992@ftp.linux.org.uk> References: <43146CC3.4010005@gentoo.org> <58cb370e05083008121f2eb783@mail.gmail.com> <43179CC9.8090608@gentoo.org> <58cb370e050927062049be32f8@mail.gmail.com> <433B16BD.7040409@gentoo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:43416 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751010AbVI1WhX (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:37:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <433B16BD.7040409@gentoo.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Drake Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, posting@blx4.net, vsu@altlinux.ru On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 11:18:37PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > This entry adds needless complication to the driver as it requires the use > of > global variables to be passed into via_get_info(), making things quite ugly > when we try and make this driver support multiple controllers > simultaneously. > > This patch removes /proc/via for simplicity. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Drake Care to explain * where to get equivalent information? * what hardware setup has more than one of those controllers?