From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] SCSI mid-layer suspend/resume Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:22:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20051025142202.226a5746.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> References: <20051024160531.7d879a7c.randy_d_dunlap@linux.intel.com> <435DA193.9010805@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <435DA193.9010805@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, axboe@suse.de, jgarzik@pobox.com, hch@lst.de List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:08:03 -0400 Mark Lord wrote: > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Although Jens's SATA suspend/resume patch works, it seems that the > > SCSI maintainer(s) want something different, e.g., Nathan Bryant's > > 2004 patch[1] with some changes: > .. > As-is, the patch fails the practical examination: > > My notebook fails to come back from suspend (to-RAM) using this patch, > but works fine with Jens' patch. Maybe I should have used Jeff's "DO NOT APPLY" wording here. I didn't mean to give the impression that the patch was complete. It's a work in progress, looking for constructive feedback, which yours is, of course. > Modern notebook, no serial port, backlight still off so no on-screen messages. > Using ata_piix (libata) for hard disk. --- ~Randy