From: linux@horizon.com
To: htejun@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux@horizon.com
Subject: Re: sata_sil24 test support
Date: 18 Nov 2005 14:36:52 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20051118193652.6403.qmail@science.horizon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20051118022349.12316.qmail@science.horizon.com>
> One thing I wanna verify on sil24 is data integrity with multiple disks
> attached. It would be very helpful if you can do some parallel data
> stress testing with multiple disks.
>
> * Parallel 'badblocks -w -t random' on all attached disks. Maybe repeat
> it for a few days and verify no corrupted IO occurs.
I only ran it for a day, but I can report success on exactly this
test on 6x Seagate 7200.8 drives (350G partition of 400G drives)
across 3x Sil3132.
That's how I found my problems, and how I verified that they were gone.
(The only "intereting" finding was that one drive was noticeably slower
than the others. Not 10%, but it finished most of an hour later. I
checked the cables and all looked well, and its partner on the same
controller was fine. I'm going to do a bit of swapping to experiment.)
This is with CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y. It was run in single-user mode (all
file systems mounted read-only) because the question was whether
live file systems were safe.
One thing I'm thinking of as a *driver* test is to write a little utility
that uses O_DIRECT to do heavy I/O to the drive's cache. That should
be able to exceed the 60 MB/sec media transfer rate limit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-11-18 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-07 9:59 sata_sil24 corruption details linux
2005-11-07 16:15 ` Greg Freemyer
2005-11-10 7:17 ` linux
2005-11-10 9:01 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-10 14:15 ` Greg Freemyer
2005-11-10 14:41 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-10 15:26 ` linux
2005-11-10 17:32 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-10 20:34 ` Greg Freemyer
2005-11-12 0:49 ` Greg Freemyer
2005-11-12 2:59 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-13 10:19 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-14 23:30 ` Greg Freemyer
2005-11-18 2:23 ` sata_sil24 corruption FIXED by motherboard swap linux
2005-11-18 19:36 ` linux [this message]
2005-11-22 0:23 ` sata_sil24 test support linux
2005-11-22 1:52 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-11 2:16 ` sata_sil24 corruption details linux
2005-11-13 6:11 ` linux
2005-11-10 17:39 ` Jens Axboe
2005-11-10 20:27 ` Edward Falk
[not found] <46377.137.32.101.32.1132172329.squirrel@www.stubbornroses.com>
[not found] ` <437C0F2D.1000406@gmail.com>
2005-11-17 5:51 ` sata_sil24 test support James O. Rose, III
2005-11-17 7:01 ` Tejun Heo
2005-11-17 19:50 ` James Rose
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-11-17 22:58 James Rose
2005-11-18 0:35 ` James Rose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20051118193652.6403.qmail@science.horizon.com \
--to=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).