linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Drew Winstel <raw@dslr.net>
To: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	John Treubig <jtreubig@hotmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ATA Write Error and Time-out Notification in User Space
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:31:38 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200512201831.38592.raw@dslr.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1135119036.25010.21.camel@localhost.localdomain>

Hi Alan,

On Tuesday, December 20, 2005 16:50, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Maw, 2005-12-20 at 15:55 -0600, John Treubig wrote:
> > Where would I look in the LibATA/SCSI chain to permit Write Error and
> > Time-out notification to be passed back to user space without hanging the
> > system?
>
> Some background first:
>
> The 2.6 block layer can generally handle passing errors back up. It has
> a load of problems with EOF on media that is variable size but block
> that need fixing but the fundamental errors get back to the block layer.
>
> Unfortunately although they get back to the block request the full error
> is not propogated further up the stack. Thats actually tricky for the
> general file system case as I/O as asynchronous to the actual file
> system accesses and we may even hit errors on pages we didn't actually
> need.
>
> One result of that is that on write errors we generally mark a volume
> offline and processes accessing it get stuck.
>

With the application that John is using (namely, it delivers reads and writes 
directly to the drive via various SG ioctls), the file system is not an 
issue, hence wanting the errors to be returned to userspace.  

I presume this means that John would have to look at the block level error 
handling as opposed to the SCSI level?

<snip>

Drew

  reply	other threads:[~2005-12-21  0:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-20 21:55 ATA Write Error and Time-out Notification in User Space John Treubig
2005-12-20 22:50 ` Alan Cox
2005-12-21  0:31   ` Drew Winstel [this message]
2005-12-22  1:09     ` Alan Cox
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-03 18:29 John Treubig
2006-01-03 18:58 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-03 19:27   ` John Treubig
2006-01-03 21:48     ` Alan Cox
2006-01-04 12:37   ` Erik Slagter
2006-01-04 12:45     ` Alan Cox
2006-01-04 12:48       ` Erik Slagter
2006-01-05 20:27 John Treubig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200512201831.38592.raw@dslr.net \
    --to=raw@dslr.net \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=jtreubig@hotmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).