From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Helmut Toplitzer Subject: Re: BUG?: VIA IDE transfer-rate problem Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:22:44 +0100 Message-ID: <200601171122.44639.pvrusb2@toplitzer.net> References: <200601131909.07981.pvrusb2@toplitzer.net> <200601161849.59629.pvrusb2@toplitzer.net> <43CCBF25.1050400@yahoo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from toplitzer.net ([83.151.30.110]:20630 "EHLO toplitzer.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932381AbWAQKWq (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jan 2006 05:22:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <43CCBF25.1050400@yahoo.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Gentoopower Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org > > Well then you probably should check your mail system, since I sent an > answer directly to: It was no answer. You suggested that a process like updatedb was doing IDE-transfers. I made my tests in single user-mode and there was no other process like updatedb etc. consuming the transfer-rate. This is highly reproducible. Loading and unloading ehci-hcd, lirc_dev/lirc_i2c and using burnK7 is always leading to the same results. Cheers helmut -- My GNUpg fingerprint http://www.gnupg.org 4563 F4FB 0B7E 8698 53CD 00E9 E319 35BD 6A91 1656