From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: memory leak in scsi_cmd_cache 2.6.15 Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:29:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20060128212911.GC13084@suse.de> References: <87ek2td4i9.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix> <20060128192714.GI9750@suse.de> <200601281347.10531.chase.venters@clientec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:60275 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750737AbWA1VfX (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:35:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601281347.10531.chase.venters@clientec.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Chase Venters Cc: Nix , Ariel , Jamie Heilman , Arjan van de Ven , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 28 2006, Chase Venters wrote: > On Saturday 28 January 2006 13:26, Jens Axboe wrote: > > It's not a bad data point, it just confirms that setting ->ordered_flush > > to 0 in the SATA drivers will fix the leak. So really, it's as expected. > > So far apparently nobody tried it, suggested it twice. > > In case you still wanted the data point, I just set ordered_flush to 0 on my > ata_piix and the slab leak disappeared. Thanks for confirming! -- Jens Axboe