From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060228094053.GT24981@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060227070830.GQ3674@stusta.de>
On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> > >Submitter : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > >Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> >
> >
> > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy.
> > It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
>
> It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
> according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.
It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.
So please scratch that entry.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-02-28 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.64.0602262122000.22647@g5.osdl.org>
2006-02-27 6:13 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-02-27 6:26 ` Ryan Phillips
2006-02-27 6:39 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2006-02-27 9:14 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions (ps2 mouse/keyboard issues) Duncan
2006-02-27 6:54 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Jeff Garzik
2006-02-27 7:08 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-28 9:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-03-01 0:17 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-04 13:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-27 13:36 ` Mark Lord
2006-02-27 14:09 ` Pavel Machek
2006-03-02 14:00 ` [v4l-dvb-maintainer] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2006-03-08 11:13 ` Brian Marete
2006-02-27 9:04 Yu, Luming
2006-03-03 2:59 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-03-03 16:51 ` Matthew Garrett
2006-03-03 21:04 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-03-03 4:46 Yu, Luming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060228094053.GT24981@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).