From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
To: "Eric D. Mudama" <edmudama@gmail.com>
Cc: sander@humilis.net, Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 19:01:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060322180127.GB3222@favonius> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <311601c90603220953t291fdb85w9f6d0fb299a00ab2@mail.gmail.com>
Eric D. Mudama wrote (ao):
> On 3/22/06, Sander <sander@humilis.net> wrote:
> > I've applied the patch against 2.6.16-git4. I'm sorry to say the
> > messages are still there:
> >
> > [ 1038.536894] kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds
> > [ 1038.555040] EXT3 FS on md0, internal journal
> > [ 1038.555072] EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with writeback data mode.
> > [ 1418.639290] ata11: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
> > [ 1418.639356] ata11: error=0x50 { UncorrectableError SectorIdNotFound }
> > [ 1418.639418] sdh: Current: sense key=0x0
> > [ 1418.639448] ASC=0x0 ASCQ=0x0
> > [ 1418.639481] Info fld=0x505050
> > [ 1684.727367] ata9: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 1684.727420] ata9: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> > [ 2223.664107] ata6: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 2223.664162] ata6: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> > [ 2381.589354] ata11: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 2381.589416] ata11: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> > [ 2511.238690] ata9: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 2511.238753] ata9: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> > [ 2990.792908] ata7: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 2990.792960] ata7: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> > [ 4672.691569] ata8: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 4672.691623] ata8: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> > [ 4988.884663] ata6: translated ATA stat/err 0xd0/00 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0xb/47/00
> > [ 4988.884717] ata6: status=0xd0 { Busy }
> >
> >
> > Could the ata11/sdh message be bogus? I re-create the raid5 and fs every
> > reboot.
>
> What, exactly, is timing out? How long is the timeout period?
I don't know to be honest. I just run the test and only afterwards check
if it doesn't fail and if the md5sums match:
for i in `seq 4`
do dd if=/dev/zero of=bigfile.$i bs=1024k count=10000
dd if=bigfile.$i of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=10000
done
time md5sum bigfile.*
time rm bigfile.*
I'm not aware of any delay or timeout. Of course the dd output differs
each run.
> The ata11 seems bogus, 50/50/50 doesn't seem right.
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-22 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-21 0:57 [git patch append] sata_mv fix Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 5:00 ` [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix Mark Lord
2006-03-21 12:13 ` Sander
2006-03-21 13:51 ` Mark Lord
2006-03-21 15:37 ` Sander
2006-03-21 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 19:15 ` Sander
2006-03-21 19:22 ` Mark Lord
2006-03-21 19:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 20:44 ` Sander
2006-03-21 20:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 21:09 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 21:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 21:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-22 5:48 ` Sander
2006-03-22 9:00 ` Sander
2006-03-22 14:50 ` Mark Lord
2006-03-22 17:09 ` Sander
2006-03-22 17:53 ` Eric D. Mudama
2006-03-22 18:01 ` Sander [this message]
2006-03-22 17:55 ` Mark Lord
2006-03-28 4:34 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 12:16 ` Sander
2006-05-03 12:42 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 13:32 ` Sander
2006-05-03 16:46 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 18:39 ` Sander
2006-03-22 2:12 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060322180127.GB3222@favonius \
--to=sander@humilis.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=edmudama@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).