From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
hch@lst.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] SCSI: fix scsi_kill_request() busy count handling
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 17:27:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060411082753.GA387@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
scsi_kill_request() completes requests via normal SCSI completion path
which decrements busy counts; however, requests which get passed to
scsi_kill_request() aren't holding busy counts and scsi_kill_request()
don't increment them before invoking completion path resulting in
incorrect busy counts. Bump up busy counts before invoking completion
path.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
a12bf362489393691d147f93fbe1aa5d5a3a513d
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 8f010a3..7b0f9a3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1479,6 +1479,8 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(
static void scsi_kill_request(struct request *req, request_queue_t *q)
{
struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = req->special;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev = cmd->device;
+ struct Scsi_Host *shost = sdev->host;
blkdev_dequeue_request(req);
@@ -1491,6 +1493,19 @@ static void scsi_kill_request(struct req
scsi_init_cmd_errh(cmd);
cmd->result = DID_NO_CONNECT << 16;
atomic_inc(&cmd->device->iorequest_cnt);
+
+ /*
+ * SCSI request completion path will do scsi_device_unbusy(),
+ * bump busy counts. To bump the counters, we need to dance
+ * with the locks as normal issue path does.
+ */
+ sdev->device_busy++;
+ spin_unlock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
+ spin_lock(shost->host_lock);
+ shost->host_busy++;
+ spin_unlock(shost->host_lock);
+ spin_lock(sdev->request_queue->queue_lock);
+
__scsi_done(cmd);
}
--
1.2.4
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-11 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-11 8:27 Tejun Heo [this message]
2006-04-11 17:44 ` [PATCH] SCSI: fix scsi_kill_request() busy count handling Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060411082753.GA387@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).