linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sander <sander@humilis.net>
To: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
Cc: sander@humilis.net, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 15:32:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060503133239.GA11811@favonius> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4458A52D.30100@rtr.ca>

Mark Lord wrote (ao):
> I'm still debugging the chip/driver on the 2.6.16.xx series,
> and my sata_mv.c code here is behaving well for most testers
> thus far here. I'm avoiding 2.6.17-* until sata_mv stabilizes
> on the existing kernels.
> 
> Does the drive probing work for you on older kernels?

Thank you for your reply. I'll try the latest 2.6.16.13 kernel and see
how that goes.

I'll also try the kernel 2.6.17-rc3 as Andrew asked me to check if the
"Assertion failed!" message is gone in that release.

> I'll email you privately and set you up with a better copy of
> sata_mv.c

Thanks!

I believe quite some bits changed in sata between 2.6.16 and 2.6.17-rcX.
I assume your sata_mv.c will not work at all on anything else than
2.6.16(.xx) ?


Btw, building raid5 over the first eight disks works fine (76% done
now). Building raid5 over the last four disks fails immediately (drives
get marked F in /proc/mdstat).

The message "PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x40000100" gives no result in
Google. Could this be a broken or miss-seated controller?

	With kind regards, Sander


[61784.672427] md: bind<sdk>
[61784.688305] md: bind<sdl>
[61784.708029] md: bind<sdm>
[61784.723717] md: bind<sdn>
[61784.744018] raid5: device sdm operational as raid disk 2
[61784.775951] raid5: device sdl operational as raid disk 1
[61784.807838] raid5: device sdk operational as raid disk 0
[61784.840407] raid5: allocated 4262kB for md2
[61784.865502] raid5: raid level 5 set md2 active with 3 out of 4 devices, algorithm 2
[61784.911459] RAID5 conf printout:
[61784.930942]  --- rd:4 wd:3 fd:1
[61784.949935]  disk 0, o:1, dev:sdk
[61784.969901]  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdl
[61784.989904]  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdm
[61785.051462] RAID5 conf printout:
[61785.070778]  --- rd:4 wd:3 fd:1
[61785.089573]  disk 0, o:1, dev:sdk
[61785.109412]  disk 1, o:1, dev:sdl
[61785.129250]  disk 2, o:1, dev:sdm
[61785.149088]  disk 3, o:1, dev:sdn
[61785.168981] md: syncing RAID array md2
[61785.191425] md: minimum _guaranteed_ reconstruction speed: 1000 KB/sec/disc.
[61785.233595] md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 200000 KB/sec) for reconstruction.
[61785.293964] md: using 128k window, over a total of 293057280 blocks.
[61788.142322] ata22: translated ATA stat/err 0x50/01 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0x3/13/00
[61788.186559] ata22: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
[61788.219510] ata22: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }
[61788.248283] sata_mv: PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x40000100
[61788.406525] ata23: translated ATA stat/err 0x50/01 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0x3/13/00
[61788.450799] ata23: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
[61788.483752] ata23: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }
[61788.512526] sata_mv: PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x40000100
[61789.169903] ata22: translated ATA stat/err 0x50/01 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0x3/13/00
[61789.214134] ata22: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
[61789.247088] ata22: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }
[61789.901445] ata24: translated ATA stat/err 0x50/01 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0x3/13/00
[61789.945686] ata24: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
[61789.978638] ata24: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }
[61790.007411] sata_mv: PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x40000100
[61790.665135] ata21: translated ATA stat/err 0x50/01 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0x3/13/00
[61790.709387] ata21: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
[61790.742337] ata21: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }
[61791.396897] ata24: translated ATA stat/err 0x50/01 to SCSI SK/ASC/ASCQ 0x3/13/00
[61791.441145] ata24: status=0x50 { DriveReady SeekComplete }
[61791.474097] ata24: error=0x01 { AddrMarkNotFound }
[61791.502871] sata_mv: PCI ERROR; PCI IRQ cause=0x40000100

[cut]


-- 
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-03 13:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-21  0:57 [git patch append] sata_mv fix Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21  5:00 ` [PATCH] 2.6.xx: sata_mv: another critical fix Mark Lord
2006-03-21 12:13   ` Sander
2006-03-21 13:51     ` Mark Lord
2006-03-21 15:37       ` Sander
2006-03-21 18:33         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 19:15           ` Sander
2006-03-21 19:22             ` Mark Lord
2006-03-21 19:35             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 20:44               ` Sander
2006-03-21 20:59                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 21:09                   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-21 21:19                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-03-21 21:37                       ` Jeff Garzik
2006-03-22  5:48                         ` Sander
2006-03-22  9:00                       ` Sander
2006-03-22 14:50                         ` Mark Lord
2006-03-22 17:09                           ` Sander
2006-03-22 17:53                             ` Eric D. Mudama
2006-03-22 18:01                               ` Sander
2006-03-22 17:55                             ` Mark Lord
2006-03-28  4:34                             ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 12:16                               ` Sander
2006-05-03 12:42                                 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 13:32                                   ` Sander [this message]
2006-05-03 16:46                                     ` Mark Lord
2006-05-03 18:39                                       ` Sander
2006-03-22  2:12   ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060503133239.GA11811@favonius \
    --to=sander@humilis.net \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mlord@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).