From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@osdl.org, jeremy@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 06:34:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060505133437.GA24268@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <445AE690.5030700@sgi.com>
On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 07:45:52AM +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> >On Thu, 4 May 2006 18:09:45 -0500 (CDT) Brent Casavant wrote:
> >
> >>Move various QLogic, Vitesse, and Intel storage
> >>controller PCI IDs to the main header file.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>
> >>
> >>---
> >>
> >>As suggested by Andrew Morton and Jes Sorenson.
> >
> >as compared to:
> >http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=9b860b8c4bde5949b272968597d1426d53080532
>
> I guess Andrew and I should be blamed for that. I Andrew suggested
> putting the IDs in the 'right place' and I took the right place as being
> the pci_ids.h file.
>
> Can't say I agree with the recommendation, having them in pci_ids.h is
> nice and clean and it allows one to go look through the list, instead
> they now really become random hex values :( Brent's patch is a perfect
> example of IDs being used in multiple places, ie. the qla1280 driver
> and in the IOC4 driver, so the claim in that Documentation/ file doesn't
> hold water.
>
> Anyway, if this is the new rule, then I guess it's back to using the
> ugly patch :(
No, I agree with your patch, as you are having to reference the ids from
2 different files. So because of that, I feel it's ok to have those ids
in the pci_id.h file.
Yes, the wording in the documentation file should be cleaned up a bit to
state this a bit better...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-05 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-04 23:09 [PATCH] Move various PCI IDs to header file Brent Casavant
2006-05-05 0:37 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-05-05 5:45 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-05-05 13:34 ` Greg KH [this message]
2006-05-13 4:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-05-05 16:27 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-05-05 22:37 ` Grant Coady
2006-05-08 7:55 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-05-08 8:31 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-08 8:35 ` Jes Sorensen
2006-05-05 14:09 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060505133437.GA24268@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
--cc=jeremy@sgi.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).