From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.6.17-rc5-git1: regression: resume from suspend(RAM) fails: libata issue Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 00:36:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20060527223607.GE364@suse.de> References: <200605272245.30108.axboe@suse.de> <4478BD60.40806@garzik.org> <20060527211157.GA31275@suse.de> <4478C1DD.2030204@garzik.org> <20060527212011.GA31551@suse.de> <4478CD4E.4000506@rtr.ca> <20060527221131.GA364@suse.de> <4478D2B4.2000500@rtr.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:21047 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964966AbWE0WgV (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 May 2006 18:36:21 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4478D2B4.2000500@rtr.ca> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Lord Cc: Linus Torvalds , Jeff Garzik , "zhao, forrest" , Tejun Heo , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 27 2006, Mark Lord wrote: > Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >On Sun, 28 May 2006, Jens Axboe wrote: > >>Works for me too, I changed the delay to match the 200000 above just to > >>be on the safe side. > > > >That's insane. That was _not_ what I expected. That wasn't actually > >supposed to fix anything at all for somebody who had problems. > > The newly added ata_wait_idle() call waits on both BUSY and DRQ, > so perhaps the wait on DRQ was what "fixed" it this time for Jens? It must be, unless the changed delay makes difference (unlikely). -- Jens Axboe