From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: State of resume for AHCI? Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 08:03:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20060602060323.GS4400@suse.de> References: <447F23C2.8030802@goop.org> <447F3250.5070101@rtr.ca> <20060601183904.GR4400@suse.de> <447F4BC2.8060808@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:56605 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138AbWFBGBd (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 02:01:33 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <447F4BC2.8060808@goop.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Mark Lord , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Hannes Reinecke , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 01 2006, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > >It's a lot more complicated than that, I'm afraid. ahci doesn't even > >have the resume/suspend methods defined, plus it needs more work than > >piix on resume. > > > Hannes Reinecke's patch implements those functions, basically by > factoring out the shutdown and init code and calling them at > suspend/resume time as well. > > Is that correct/sufficient? Or should something else be happening? No that's it, I know for a fact that suspend/resume works perfectly with the 10.1 suse kernel. You can give that a shot, if you want. -- Jens Axboe