From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: "zhao, forrest" <forrest.zhao@intel.com>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, hare@suse.de, htejun@gmail.com, jeremy@goop.org,
lkml@rtr.ca, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] The definition of ahci_start_fis_rx() and ahci_stop_fis_rx()
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 11:26:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060602092626.GE4400@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1149239367.29552.9.camel@forrest26.sh.intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 02 2006, zhao, forrest wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 11:15 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 02 2006, zhao, forrest wrote:
> > > + /*
> > > + * Disable FIS reception
> > > + *
> > > + * AHCI Rev 1.1 Section 10.1.2:
> > > + * If PxCMD.FRE is set to '1', software should clear it
> > > + * to '0' and wait at least 500 milliseconds for PxCMD.FR
> > > + * to return '0' when read. If PxCMD.FR does not clear
> > > + * '0' correctly, then software may attempt a port reset
> > > + * of a full HBA reset to recover.
> > > + */
> > > + tmp &= ~(PORT_CMD_FIS_RX);
> > > + writel(tmp, port_mmio + PORT_CMD);
> > > +
> > > + mdelay(500);
> > > + work = 1000;
> >
> > The spec states that you should wait up to 500msec for this condition to
> > happen, not wait 500msec before looking at it! So please rework this
> > bit, a half second potentially wasted busy loop is quite nasty.
>
> The spec says If PxCMD.FRE is set to '1', software should clear it to
> '0' and wait *at least* 500 milliseconds for PxCMD.FR to return '0' when
> read.
>
> It's "at least", not "up to".
That still doesn't make the code right. So make it wait 1 seconds max,
but don't delay 500msec at the beginning. That's my problem.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-02 9:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 7:44 [PATCH 2/6] The definition of ahci_start_fis_rx() and ahci_stop_fis_rx() zhao, forrest
2006-06-02 8:08 ` Hannes Reinecke
2006-06-02 9:15 ` Jens Axboe
2006-06-02 9:09 ` zhao, forrest
2006-06-02 9:26 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2006-06-02 9:21 ` zhao, forrest
2006-06-03 12:51 ` Tejun Heo
2006-06-03 19:10 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-06-06 10:16 zhao, forrest
2006-06-29 8:18 zhao, forrest
2006-07-10 3:35 zhao, forrest
2006-07-10 17:08 ` Jens Axboe
2006-07-11 6:37 zhao, forrest
2006-07-13 5:38 zhao, forrest
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060602092626.GE4400@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=forrest.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).