linux-ide.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: "Ask Bjørn Hansen" <ask@develooper.com>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sata_mv with Adaptec AIC-8130/Marvell 88SX6041 ("Badness in __msleep")
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 22:45:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200606022245.49637.liml@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EA69B14D-2874-48EA-BF67-0A96DE690FA6@develooper.com>

On Friday 02 June 2006 21:42, Ask Bjørn Hansen wrote:
> 
> On May 28, 2006, at 19:49, Mark Lord wrote:
> 
> > The attached patch [0.7-backport] is an untested backport of the  
> > latest sata_mv,
> > which should be more reliable than what you've been using. [0.5]
> 
> It works most of the time (where the 0.5 didn't work most of the  
> time), but I still see the "Badness in __msleep" occasionally (and it  
> only detects one of the disks then).    However, the Adaptec BIOS is  
> only seeing one of the disks sometimes, so maybe there's something  
> wrong with the hardware.  The BIOS did detect both drives in the boot  
> that gave the output below though.

Weird.  I cannot make sense of that traceback.  What CPU is this kernel built for?

And does this patch (below) make the "Badness" go away?

Cheers

---
--- linux/drivers/scsi/sata_mv.c.16-backport	2006-05-26 09:15:22.000000000 -0400
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/sata_mv.c	2006-06-02 22:39:07.000000000 -0400
@@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@
 
 static void mv_phy_reset(struct ata_port *ap)
 {
-	__mv_phy_reset(ap, 1);
+	__mv_phy_reset(ap, 0);
 }
 
 /**

      reply	other threads:[~2006-06-03  2:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-29  2:31 sata_mv with Adaptec AIC-8130/Marvell 88SX6041 ("Badness in __msleep") Ask Bjørn Hansen
2006-05-29  2:49 ` Mark Lord
2006-05-29 19:51   ` Ask Bjørn Hansen
2006-06-03  1:42   ` Ask Bjørn Hansen
2006-06-03  2:45     ` Mark Lord [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200606022245.49637.liml@rtr.ca \
    --to=liml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=ask@develooper.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).