From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Terence Ripperda Subject: Re: What determines which interrupts are shared under Linux? Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 12:43:38 -0500 Message-ID: <20060815174338.GR7189@hygelac> References: <44E1D760.6070600@atipa.com> <20060815173116.GQ7189@hygelac> <44E20799.4060606@ru.mvista.com> Reply-To: Terence Ripperda Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from hqemgate02.nvidia.com ([216.228.112.143]:41240 "EHLO HQEMGATE02.nvidia.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030398AbWHORnw (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:43:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E20799.4060606@ru.mvista.com> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: Terence Ripperda , Roger Heflin , Linux-Kernel , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 09:42:49PM +0400, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com wrote: > Hello. > > Terence Ripperda wrote: > >we've seen a lot of problems on ck804 chipsets when multiple devices > >share level-triggered interrupts. I think some of the earlier sample > >bioses assumed that interrupts would be configured via ACPI, and when > >ACPI is not used, the interrupts end up as level-triggered instead of > >edge-triggered. > > Edge-triggered *shared* interrupts?! Now that sounds interesting (I'm > not saying impossible). ah shoot, you're right. doing too much and got the two backwards. ignore my email, I'm going off to sit in the corner with a dunce cap on.. > > WBR, Sergei ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------