From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: What's in libata-dev.git Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 21:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: <20060911195128.GB6775@kernel.dk> References: <20060911132250.GA5178@havoc.gtf.org> <45056627.7030202@ru.mvista.com> <450566A2.1090009@garzik.org> <450568F3.3020005@ru.mvista.com> <1157986974.23085.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <45057651.8000404@garzik.org> <1157988513.23085.159.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20060911153706.GE4955@suse.de> <1157991998.23085.164.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([62.242.22.158]:46187 "EHLO kernel.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751359AbWIKTxL (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Sep 2006 15:53:11 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1157991998.23085.164.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: Jeff Garzik , Sergei Shtylyov , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds On Mon, Sep 11 2006, Alan Cox wrote: > Ar Llu, 2006-09-11 am 17:37 +0200, ysgrifennodd Jens Axboe: > > On Mon, Sep 11 2006, Alan Cox wrote: > > > sometimes. The IBM's abort the xfer but the maxtors may or may not get > > > it right (its as if half the firmware has the right test). > > > > So this is a confirmed, broken case? Why has no one complained for 2.4 > > and 2.6? > > They did and proposed patches. Link? -- Jens Axboe