From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drivers/ata: export some static functions in libata-core.c Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 14:05:56 +0100 Message-ID: <200701111405.56575.arnd@arndb.de> References: <200701110853.l0B8rtGK009404@toshiba.co.jp> <200701111008.34866.arnd@arndb.de> <200701110928.l0B9SUri015056@toshiba.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200701110928.l0B9SUri015056@toshiba.co.jp> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org List-Id: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 11 January 2007 10:30, Akira Iguchi wrote: > >Exporting new symbols needs some explanation here about why they > >should now be global for ata_scc while the existing drivers > >did not need them. Since the patch otherwise only moves stuff > >around as needed, I assume it's good. > > I thought it was better to use common functions as far as possible. > But if it is preferable to copy them in ata_scc.c, I will do so. To clarify my words here: It is definitely better to use common functions or to modify the common code rather than copy it. This particular patch (2/2) only moves code around, so what I meant is that I'm confident that it does not introduce bugs. Arnd <><