Re: sata_vsc.c cache line size question

[Jeremy Higdon <jeremy@sgi.com>]

On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 09:42:44AM -0500, Dailey, Nate wrote:
> Okay, trying again as an attachment...
> 
> Nate

Hi Nate, sorry about the delay.  This patch works fine.  Please see
http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html and send a new patch, if you would.
Then presumably jgarzik will take it, since it's a good fix.
Or if you want, I could generate the new patch.

Thanks,

jeremy



> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Higdon [mailto:jeremy@sgi.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:12 AM
> To: Dailey, Nate
> Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: sata_vsc.c cache line size question
> 
> On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 11:26:59AM -0500, Dailey, Nate wrote:
> > Here's a patch that does what you suggest.
> > 
> > Because the default cache line size on my system is 0x10, I tested the
> > patch by checking against this value rather than 0... it worked as
> > expected.
> > 
> > This patch is against 2.6.19.2 that I just downloaded from kernel.org.
> I
> > actually tested on RHEL4 update 4, a 2.6.9 kernel, but I'll try
> building
> > the 2.6.19.2 on my system to make sure it works in that version as
> well.
> > 
> > Nate
> 
> Hi Nate,
> 
> The patch looks fine, except that your mailer wrapped the lines.
> Try sending it as a text attachment instead.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> jeremy